Back of the Book:
Cassia has always trusted the Society to make the right choices for her: what to read, what to watch, what to believe. So when Xander’s face appears on-screen at her Matching ceremony, Cassia knows he is her ideal mate . . . until she sees Ky Markham’s face flash for an instant before the screen fades to black. The Society tells her it’s a glitch, a rare malfunction, and that she should focus on the happy life she’s destined to lead with Xander. But Cassia can’t stop thinking about Ky, and as they slowly fall in love, Cassia begins to doubt the Society’s infallibility and is faced with an impossible choice: between Xander and Ky, between the only life she’s known and a path that no one else has dared to follow.
From School Library Journal:
In a story that is at once evocative of Lois Lowry’s The Giver (Houghton, 1993), George Orwell’s 1984, and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, Condie introduces readers to the “perfect” Society. Cassia Reyes is a model student, daughter, and citizen. How could she not be when the Society has everything planned and functioning perfectly? All of her needs are met: food, shelter, education, career training, and even her future husband are selected by officials who know what is best for each individual by studying statistical data and probable odds. She even knows when she will die, on her 80th birthday, just as the Society dictates. At her Match Banquet she is paired with Xander, her best friend and certainly her soul mate. But when a computer error shows her the face of Ky, an Aberration, instead of Xander, cracks begin to appear in the Society’s facade of perfection. A series of events also shakes her dedication to Xander and puts her future in jeopardy. Cassia exhibits some characteristics of Winston Smith and Lenina Crowne in her silent rebellion against societal control and in her illicit friendship with Ky but ultimately, and more satisfyingly, she is more like Lowry’s Jonas. Her awakening and development are realistically portrayed, and supporting characters like Cassia’s parents and her grandfather add depth to the story. The biggest flaw is that the story is not finished. Fans of the Giver will devour this book and impatiently demand the next installment.–Anthony C. Doyle, Livingston High School, CA. (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Format Read: ebook
The very worst thing about this book is that it draws so heavily on “The Giver” from Lois Lowry. I think the only big differences are that attraction and romance are encouraged once you are matched and people give birth to and sire their own children. The characters a lacking a bit in depth, but I’m hopeful that they’ll develop as the story continues.
The very best thing about this book is how it takes “The Giver” and gives it an extra dimension. I kind of imagine this to be how the Council would try to “fix” everything at the end of “The Giver.” Most things stay the same, they’re still in control, but you’re allowed to feel and reproduce – with permission. I’m really looking forward to “Crossed,” the next book in the trilogy, and I believe it comes out in November. Oh, and I love the cover! It’s what caught my attention, because the title sure didn’t. O_o